Skip to main content

Toyota LAND CRUISER - 2022

49.1 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2022 is 71.1 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Toyota LAND CRUISER, model year 2022. Sample size: 525 cars, 650 tests and 319 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 525 cars

The 2022 Toyota Land Cruiser has a defect rate of 49 per 100 vehicles, which is significantly better than the yearly average of 70 per 100, indicating a 30% lower likelihood of defects. Notable strengths include its performance in the Lights & Electrics category, where it shows a 21% lower defect rate compared to the average, and in Wheels, Suspensions & Axles, where it performs 47% better. However, it does have some weaknesses, particularly in the Equipment and Other categories, where its defect rates are higher than average. Overall, the Land Cruiser exhibits fewer defects than typical for its year, especially in key functional areas.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 525 cars

More model years for Toyota LAND CRUISER

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Other models from Toyota

Toyota ALPHARD Toyota AURIS Toyota AVENSIS Toyota AYGO Toyota CELICA Toyota COROLLA Toyota ESTIMA Toyota GT86 Toyota HI-ACE Toyota HILUX Toyota IQ Toyota LAND CRUISER Toyota MR2 Toyota PREVIA Toyota PROACE Toyota RAV4 Toyota STARLET Toyota VELLFIRE Toyota VERSO Toyota YARIS

Categories

Brakes
▲ 8.3% better
28.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 31.2 / 100 tests
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
  • Brake lining or pad: worn down to wear indicator
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
Steering
▼ 25.0% worse
0.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 0.4 / 100 tests
  • Steering
  • A steering linkage component: with an unsafe modification
Visibility
▲ 1.6% better
12.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 12.5 / 100 tests
  • Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
  • Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
  • Wiper blade: defective
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
Lights & Electrics
▲ 23.9% better
8.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 10.9 / 100 tests
  • A lens defective: which has no effect on emitted light
  • Beam image obviously incorrect
  • The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
  • The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
  • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 46.7% better
43.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 82.0 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
Body/Structure
▲ 100.0% better
0.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 1.6 / 100 tests
Equipment
▼ 38.5% worse
1.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 1.3 / 100 tests
  • A seat belt:
  • A statutory seat belt missing
  • A seat belt:
  • Seat belt buckle missing, damaged or not functioning as intended
  • ESC MIL indicates a system malfunction
Other
▼ 33.3% worse
2.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 2.1 / 100 tests
  • Smoke opacity levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limit
  • Engine MIL inoperative or indicating a malfunction
  • Smoke opacity levels exceed default limit
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 400 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 96
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 38
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 28
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
FAIL
Occurrences: 15
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
MINOR
Occurrences: 14
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 11
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
PRS
Occurrences: 10
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
PRS
Occurrences: 9
Wiper blade: defective
MINOR
Occurrences: 9
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 8

Serious faults (Top 10)

A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
FAIL
Occurrences: 15
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 11
Smoke opacity levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limit
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 4
Brake lining or pad: worn down to wear indicator
FAIL
Occurrences: 3
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 3
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 3
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 2
Beam image obviously incorrect
FAIL
Occurrences: 2
Insufficient reserve travel
FAIL
Occurrences: 2