Suzuki CELERIO - 2015
144.6 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2015 is 174.5 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Suzuki CELERIO, model year 2015.
Sample size: 7,193 cars, 14,281 tests and 20,645 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Quick summary
Total: 7,193 cars
The 2015 Suzuki Celerio shows a lower overall defect rate compared to the yearly average, with 145 defects per 100 vehicles, which is 15% better than the average of 170 defects per 100. Notably, it excels in categories such as Steering, where defects are significantly lower at just 0.83% compared to the average of 9.2%, and it also performs well in Body/Structure and Equipment. However, it faces challenges with Brakes and Visibility, where defect rates are higher than average. Mileage-related trends indicate increasing defects as mileage increases, yet the Celerio still performs comparably to the average across different mileage segments.
Cars by mileage segment
Total: 7,193 cars
More model years for Suzuki CELERIO
Other models from Suzuki
Categories
Brakes
▼ 21.8% worse
103.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 84.7 / 100 tests
- Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
- Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
- Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
- Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
- Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
Steering
▲ 91.9% better
0.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 9.9 / 100 tests
- Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: damaged or deteriorated
- A steering ball joint: with excessive wear or free play
- Excessive roughness in operation of steering
- Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
- A steering ball joint: with excessive wear or free play
Visibility
▼ 33.5% worse
21.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 16.1 / 100 tests
- Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
- Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
- Wiper blade: defective
- Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
- Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
Lights & Electrics
▲ 21.6% better
24.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 31.0 / 100 tests
- Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
- Stop lamp(s): all missing or inoperative
- A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
- Stop lamp(s): all missing or inoperative
- The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 28.0% better
128.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 178.3 / 100 tests
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
- A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
- A suspension joint dust cover: severely deteriorated
- A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
Body/Structure
▲ 65.8% better
4.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 11.7 / 100 tests
- Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that: the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced
- Bumper: insecure or with damage likely to cause injury when grazed or contacted
- Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
- A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot: severely deteriorated
- Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
Equipment
▲ 32.5% better
2.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 4.0 / 100 tests
- A seat belt: webbing or flexible stalk significantly stretched or weakened
- Audible warning:
- Seat belt not functioning as intended or of an incorrect type
- Seat belt buckle missing, damaged or not functioning as intended
- A seat belt:
Other
▲ 68.2% better
4.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 13.2 / 100 tests
- Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
- Engine MIL inoperative or indicating a malfunction
- Emissions levels exceed default limits
- Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer
- Emissions test unable to be completed
Fault rate by mileage segment
Model
Year average
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.
Most common faults (Top 10)
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 3,153
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 2,675
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 2,584
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 959
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 804
A suspension joint dust cover: severely deteriorated
MINOR
Occurrences: 697
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 577
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 521
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
FAIL
Occurrences: 473
Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 465
Serious faults (Top 10)
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
FAIL
Occurrences: 473
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 333
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 263
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 231
Stop lamp(s): all missing or inoperative
FAIL
Occurrences: 208
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 150
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
FAIL
Occurrences: 134
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
FAIL
Occurrences: 127
Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 105
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 101