Skip to main content

Rolls royce GHOST - 2010

23.8 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2010 is 296.9 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Rolls royce GHOST, model year 2010. Sample size: 163 cars, 369 tests and 88 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 163 cars

The 2010 Rolls Royce Ghost shows a significantly lower overall defect rate, with only 24 defects per 100 vehicles compared to the average of 294. This represents a 91.9% improvement over typical performance for cars of the same year. The model excels particularly in categories such as brakes, steering, and visibility, all registering defects well below the average rates. Notably, there is a concerning trend in higher mileage categories, especially for those exceeding 124,000 miles, where the defect rate soars to 1,000 per 100 vehicles, indicating a potential area of concern as the vehicle ages. Overall, this model demonstrates superior reliability, particularly in critical safety aspects, compared to its peers.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 163 cars

Categories

Brakes
▲ 94.8% better
6.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 114.9 / 100 tests
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
  • Brakes imbalance across an axle such that: the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. Or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight lin
Steering
▲ 97.0% better
0.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 16.9 / 100 tests
Visibility
▲ 92.9% better
1.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 22.4 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▲ 98.6% better
1.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 77.6 / 100 tests
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 87.7% better
35.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 285.3 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • A shock absorber damaged … or showing signs of severe leakage
Body/Structure
▲ 97.0% better
1.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 36.3 / 100 tests
  • Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
Equipment
▲ 100.0% better
0.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 8.1 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 93.2% better
2.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 32.3 / 100 tests
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 1,000 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 37
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 12
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 7
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 5
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 4
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 4
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 3
A shock absorber damaged … or showing signs of severe leakage
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 3
Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 2
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that: the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. Or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight lin
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 2

Serious faults (Top 10)

A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 3
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
FAIL
Occurrences: 1
An obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 1
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 1