Skip to main content

Peugeot 106 - 1999

302.4 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 1999 is 349.1 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Peugeot 106, model year 1999. Sample size: 244 cars, 465 tests and 1,406 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 244 cars

The Peugeot 106 from 1999 has an overall defect rate of 302 per 100 vehicles, which is 12% lower than the average for cars of the same year at 345 per 100. While tyre wear is common across many vehicles, this model stands out with significantly better performance in categories such as steering and visibility, with defects in these areas much lower than average. However, it does have a higher rate of issues related to body structure and other defects compared to its peers. Mileage trends show an increasing defect rate with age, particularly in vehicles over 124,000 miles.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 244 cars

More model years for Peugeot 106

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Other models from Peugeot

Peugeot 1007 Peugeot 106 Peugeot 107 Peugeot 108 Peugeot 2008 Peugeot 205 Peugeot 206 Peugeot 207 Peugeot 208 Peugeot 3008 Peugeot 306 Peugeot 307 Peugeot 308 Peugeot 4007 Peugeot 406 Peugeot 407 Peugeot 5008 Peugeot 508 Peugeot BIPPER Peugeot BOXER Peugeot EXPERT Peugeot HORIZON Peugeot PARTNER Peugeot RCZ Peugeot RIFTER

Categories

Brakes
▲ 17.9% better
126.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 153.4 / 100 tests
  • Service brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
  • Brakes imbalance across an axle such that: the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. Or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight lin
  • Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
Steering
▲ 55.2% better
11.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 25.9 / 100 tests
  • Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: damaged or deteriorated
  • Power steering fluid leaking or system malfunctioning
  • Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
  • A steering ball joint: with excessive wear or free play
  • Power steering: inoperative and steering adversely affected
Visibility
▲ 28.9% better
18.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 26.6 / 100 tests
  • Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
  • Wiper blade: defective
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
  • Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
  • Obligatory mirror or device: slightly damaged or loose
Lights & Electrics
▲ 2.7% better
71.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 73.0 / 100 tests
  • Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
  • Stop lamp(s): all missing or inoperative
  • Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
  • Lamp: multiple light source up to a half not functioning
  • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 27.0% better
194.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 266.9 / 100 tests
  • The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
Body/Structure
▼ 23.1% worse
94.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 76.5 / 100 tests
  • Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
  • Body, cab or chassis: excessively corroded at mounting points
  • Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that: the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced
  • A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot: severely deteriorated
  • Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that: the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced
Equipment
▲ 32.8% better
12.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 19.2 / 100 tests
  • is significantly reduced or The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a ’prescribed area’): inadequately repaired
  • is significantly reduced or The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a ’prescribed area’): inadequately repaired
  • A seat belt:
  • A seat belt: webbing or flexible stalk significantly stretched or weakened
  • Seat belt buckle missing, damaged or not functioning as intended
Other
▼ 33.3% worse
75.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 56.5 / 100 tests
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
  • Emissions levels exceed default limits
  • Emissions test unable to be completed
  • Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits
  • Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 652 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 86
Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that: the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 66
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 65
The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
FAIL
Occurrences: 63
The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 63
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 62
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 55
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 41
Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 36
Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 36

Serious faults (Top 10)

The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
FAIL
Occurrences: 63
Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 36
Emissions levels exceed default limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 27
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that: the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. Or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight lin
FAIL
Occurrences: 26
Service brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 24
Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer
FAIL
Occurrences: 22
Body, cab or chassis: excessively corroded at mounting points
FAIL
Occurrences: 20
Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
FAIL
Occurrences: 16
Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that: the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced
FAIL
Occurrences: 15
A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot: missing, split, insecure or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt
FAIL
Occurrences: 13