Skip to main content

Peugeot 106 - 1998

263.5 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 1998 is 342.9 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Peugeot 106, model year 1998. Sample size: 644 cars, 1,272 tests and 3,352 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 644 cars

The 1998 Peugeot 106 has an overall defect rate of 264 defects per 100 vehicles, which is 22% lower than the average for cars of the same year at 339 defects per 100. This model performs particularly well in categories like brakes, steering, and visibility, with defect rates significantly better than the average. However, it shows a notable increase in the "Other" defects category, which is higher by 48% compared to the average. As mileage increases, the defect rate also rises, but the Peugeot 106 remains well within manageable levels compared to its peers.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 644 cars

More model years for Peugeot 106

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Other models from Peugeot

Peugeot 1007 Peugeot 106 Peugeot 107 Peugeot 108 Peugeot 2008 Peugeot 205 Peugeot 206 Peugeot 207 Peugeot 208 Peugeot 3008 Peugeot 306 Peugeot 307 Peugeot 308 Peugeot 4007 Peugeot 406 Peugeot 407 Peugeot 5008 Peugeot 508 Peugeot BIPPER Peugeot BOXER Peugeot EXPERT Peugeot HORIZON Peugeot PARTNER Peugeot RCZ Peugeot RIFTER

Categories

Brakes
▲ 32.1% better
101.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 149.4 / 100 tests
  • Service brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brakes imbalance across an axle such that: the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. Or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight lin
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
  • Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
Steering
▲ 54.7% better
11.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 25.6 / 100 tests
  • Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: damaged or deteriorated
  • A steering ball joint: with excessive wear or free play
  • Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
  • Power steering fluid leaking or system malfunctioning
  • A steering ball joint: with excessive wear or free play
Visibility
▲ 20.9% better
20.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 26.3 / 100 tests
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
  • Wiper blade: defective
  • Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
  • Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
Lights & Electrics
▲ 11.4% better
59.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 66.7 / 100 tests
  • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
  • A battery insecure: but not likely to fall from carrier
  • Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
  • Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
  • The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 31.1% better
177.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 257.8 / 100 tests
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
Body/Structure
▲ 26.3% better
59.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 80.5 / 100 tests
  • Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that: the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced
  • Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
  • Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
  • A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot: missing, split, insecure or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt
  • A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot: severely deteriorated
Equipment
▲ 41.7% better
11.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 20.4 / 100 tests
  • is significantly reduced or The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a ’prescribed area’): inadequately repaired
  • An SRS malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) indicates a system malfunction
  • A seat belt: webbing or flexible stalk significantly stretched or weakened
  • is significantly reduced or The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a ’prescribed area’): inadequately repaired
  • Audible warning:
Other
▼ 44.7% worse
85.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 59.0 / 100 tests
  • Emissions levels exceed default limits
  • Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
  • Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits
  • Emissions test unable to be completed

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 543 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 288
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 209
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 168
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 146
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 145
Emissions levels exceed default limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 107
The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 104
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 102
Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 97
Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 84

Serious faults (Top 10)

Emissions levels exceed default limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 107
Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 84
Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer
FAIL
Occurrences: 71
The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
FAIL
Occurrences: 62
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that: the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. Or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight lin
FAIL
Occurrences: 46
A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot: missing, split, insecure or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt
FAIL
Occurrences: 41
Service brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 38
Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
FAIL
Occurrences: 37
Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
FAIL
Occurrences: 37
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 31