Skip to main content

NISSAN PIXO MOT Statistics by Year

Select a model year to see detailed MOT results; including pass rates, mileage trends, and the most common defects found for that specific NISSAN PIXO.

Defect rate by model year

Comparison of Nissan PIXO versus average car of the same model year.

The Nissan Pixo, a compact city car, was produced from 2009 to 2013 and is often recognized for its economical design and practicality. Targeted at urban drivers seeking affordability, the Pixo combines a small footprint with a fuel-efficient engine. However, its reliability has been a point of discussion among automotive enthusiasts and potential buyers alike.

When examining the reliability of the Nissan Pixo through MOT inspection data, it is evident that the model generally exhibits a higher defect rate compared to the average cars of the same years. For instance, the 2009 model recorded approximately 338 defects per 100 tests, which is about 9% higher than the average for that year. This trend continues across subsequent years, with the 2010 and 2011 models also showing defect rates exceeding their respective averages by 9% and 15%. The 2012 and 2013 models, while showing improvement, still had defect rates of 290 and 249 per 100 tests, which were 18% and 13% above the average rates.

Recurring issues noted in the data include problems with brake pipes, suspension components, and tyre conditions. Specifically, defects such as damaged or corroded brake pipes and excessively worn suspension parts were prevalent across all years. Additionally, tyre-related issues, such as insufficient tread depth and structural damage, were frequently reported, although these problems can be common across various car models and not solely indicative of the Pixo’s design.

The 2013 model stands out as the best performer among its peers, with a notable reduction in defects compared to earlier years, while the 2011 model presents the highest relative defect rate, underscoring its challenges in reliability. The overall trend suggests that while the Pixo may have improved slightly in later years, it still struggles to meet the reliability benchmarks set by other vehicles in its class.

Did you know?

In summary, the Nissan Pixo's reputation as a budget-friendly urban vehicle is somewhat marred by its reliability concerns, as evidenced by consistent defect rates above average. As a trivia note, the Pixo shares its platform with the Suzuki Alto, which has generally received more favorable reliability ratings, highlighting the variance that can exist even among closely related models.