Skip to main content

Nissan 370 Z - 2010

141.0 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2010 is 296.9 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Nissan 370 Z, model year 2010. Sample size: 726 cars, 1,606 tests and 2,264 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 726 cars

The 2010 Nissan 370 Z exhibits a significantly lower overall defect rate compared to the average car of the same year, with 141 defects per 100 vehicles, which is 52% better than the average of 294 defects per 100 vehicles. Mileage data shows a consistent increase in defects as mileage increases, although the 370 Z's rates remain favourable across all mileage segments. This model particularly stands out for its excellent performance in categories such as brakes and steering, with defect rates much lower than the average. Additionally, it shows a remarkable reduction in issues related to lights and electrics, highlighting its reliability in these areas.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 726 cars

More model years for Nissan 370 Z

2009 2010 2011 2012

Other models from Nissan

Nissan 350 Z Nissan 370 Z Nissan ALMERA Nissan CABSTAR Nissan CUBE Nissan E-NV200 Nissan FIGARO Nissan GT-R Nissan JUKE Nissan LEAF Nissan MICRA Nissan NAVARA Nissan NOTE Nissan NV300 Nissan NV400 Nissan PATHFINDER Nissan PIXO Nissan PRIMASTAR Nissan PULSAR Nissan QASHQAI Nissan SERENA Nissan SKYLINE Nissan TERRANO Nissan X-TRAIL

Categories

Brakes
▲ 50.7% better
56.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 114.9 / 100 tests
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake hose ferrules: excessively corroded
  • Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
  • Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
  • Excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution
Steering
▲ 48.5% better
8.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 16.9 / 100 tests
  • Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: damaged or deteriorated
  • Power steering pipe, hose or wiring: excessively damaged or corroded
  • Power steering fluid leaking or system malfunctioning
  • Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
  • Steering box: leaking oil
Visibility
▲ 43.3% better
12.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 22.4 / 100 tests
  • Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
  • Wiper blade: defective
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
  • Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
Lights & Electrics
▲ 68.7% better
24.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 77.6 / 100 tests
  • Product on the lens or light source which obviously reduces light intensity or changes emitted colour to other than white or yellow
  • Beam image obviously incorrect
  • Headlamp reflector or lens: seriously defective or missing
  • Headlamp reflector or lens: slightly defective
  • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 50.3% better
141.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 285.3 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
  • A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
Body/Structure
▲ 49.3% better
18.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 36.3 / 100 tests
  • Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
  • Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
  • A main load-bearing structural member: fractured or deformed such that structural rigidity is significantly reduced
  • Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that: the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced
  • Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that: the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced
Equipment
▲ 88.9% better
0.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 8.1 / 100 tests
  • Audible warning:
  • ESC MIL indicates a system malfunction
  • An SRS malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) indicates a system malfunction
Other
▲ 43.0% better
18.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 32.3 / 100 tests
  • Emissions levels exceed default limits
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
  • Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer
  • Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits
  • Exhaust noise levels in excess of those permitted

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 443 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 388
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 228
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 167
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 164
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 142
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 80
Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 71
Product on the lens or light source which obviously reduces light intensity or changes emitted colour to other than white or yellow
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 51
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
MINOR
Occurrences: 48
Brake hose ferrules: excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 41

Serious faults (Top 10)

Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer
FAIL
Occurrences: 32
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 29
Emissions levels exceed default limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 27
Beam image obviously incorrect
FAIL
Occurrences: 26
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 22
Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 21
Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 21
A wheel bearing: excessively rough
FAIL
Occurrences: 14
The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
FAIL
Occurrences: 14
Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
FAIL
Occurrences: 14