Mini CLUBMAN - 2011
237.2 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2011 is 274.4 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Mini CLUBMAN, model year 2011.
Sample size: 135 cars, 301 tests and 714 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Quick summary
Total: 135 cars
The 2011 MINI Clubman has an overall defect rate of 237 per 100 vehicles, which is notably lower than the average of 271 per 100. This model excels in categories such as brakes and steering, with significantly fewer defects compared to the average car. However, it shows a higher incidence of visibility and equipment-related defects, indicating areas for improvement. Mileage trends reveal that defect rates are highest for vehicles with lower mileage, which is atypical compared to the general trend observed in other models from the same year. Overall, the Clubman stands out positively in terms of brake and steering performance but has notable weaknesses in visibility and equipment issues.
Cars by mileage segment
Total: 135 cars
More model years for Mini CLUBMAN
Other models from Mini
Categories
Brakes
▲ 23.8% better
83.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 109.9 / 100 tests
- Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
- Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
Steering
▲ 66.5% better
5.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 15.8 / 100 tests
Visibility
▼ 56.6% worse
33.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 21.2 / 100 tests
- Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
Lights & Electrics
▼ 2.2% worse
70.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 68.9 / 100 tests
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 13.4% better
230.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 266.4 / 100 tests
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
- A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
- A wheel: badly distorted or wear between wheel and hub at spigot mounting
- A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
Body/Structure
▲ 51.1% better
15.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 31.3 / 100 tests
Equipment
▼ 70.3% worse
12.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 7.4 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 16.2% better
23.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 27.8 / 100 tests
- Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
Fault rate by mileage segment
Model
Year average
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.
Most common faults (Top 10)
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 82
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 54
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 50
A wheel: badly distorted or wear between wheel and hub at spigot mounting
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 41
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 40
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 37
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
MINOR
Occurrences: 28
Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 25
A shock absorber damaged … or showing signs of severe leakage
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 22
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 20
Serious faults (Top 10)
Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 15
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 9
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 8
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 4
Headlamp levelling device inoperative
FAIL
Occurrences: 4
Engine MIL inoperative or indicating a malfunction
FAIL
Occurrences: 3
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 3
A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
FAIL
Occurrences: 3