Skip to main content

Mercedes-benz S-CLASS - 2010

176.6 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2010 is 296.9 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Mercedes-benz S-CLASS, model year 2010. Sample size: 1,015 cars, 2,245 tests and 3,964 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 1,015 cars

The 2010 Mercedes-Benz S-Class exhibits a significantly lower overall defect rate compared to the average car of the same year, with 177 defects per 100 vehicles compared to 294 defects. Notably, it outperforms in several categories, including steering, where defects are 78% lower than average, and lights and electrics, which show an 83% improvement. Despite showing higher defect rates in the 0-31,000 miles and 124,000+ miles categories, the model generally performs better in terms of body structure and visibility. Overall, the S-Class demonstrates a strong reliability profile compared to its peers.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 1,015 cars

Categories

Brakes
▼ 11.1% worse
127.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 114.9 / 100 tests
  • Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
  • Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
Steering
▲ 78.7% better
3.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 16.9 / 100 tests
Visibility
▲ 48.2% better
11.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 22.4 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▲ 83.4% better
12.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 77.6 / 100 tests
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 43.2% better
162.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 285.3 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A wheel bearing: with excessive play
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
Body/Structure
▲ 74.1% better
9.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 36.3 / 100 tests
Equipment
▲ 65.4% better
2.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 8.1 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 28.5% better
23.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 32.3 / 100 tests
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 443 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 719
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 462
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 322
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 310
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 212
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 182
A wheel bearing: with excessive play
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 170
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 142
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 135
Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 105

Serious faults (Top 10)

A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 142
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 59
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 47
A direction indicator: lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 32
Parking brake inoperative on one side, or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight line
FAIL
Occurrences: 29
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
FAIL
Occurrences: 28
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 28
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 26
Smoke opacity levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limit
FAIL
Occurrences: 26
Parking brake efficiency: less than 50% of the required value
FAIL
Occurrences: 23