Skip to main content

Mercedes-benz S-CLASS - 1998

250.1 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 1998 is 342.9 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Mercedes-benz S-CLASS, model year 1998. Sample size: 197 cars, 375 tests and 938 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 197 cars

The 1998 Mercedes-Benz S-Class has a lower overall defect rate of 250 defects per 100 vehicles, which is 26% better than the average for its year at 339 defects per 100. The model performs particularly well in categories such as Brakes, Lights & Electrics, and Body/Structure, showing significantly fewer defects compared to the average. However, it faces a higher rate of issues related to Visibility, which is 32% for this model compared to 26% for the average. Mileage trends indicate that defects increase with higher mileage, especially in the 62,000-93,000-mile range, although the S-Class still maintains a better overall performance than typical vehicles of the same age.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 197 cars

Categories

Brakes
▲ 26.8% better
109.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 149.4 / 100 tests
  • Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
Steering
▲ 12.5% better
22.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 25.6 / 100 tests
Visibility
▼ 23.6% worse
32.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 26.3 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▲ 23.2% better
51.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 66.7 / 100 tests
  • Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 20.1% better
205.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 257.8 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
  • A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
Body/Structure
▲ 76.1% better
19.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 80.5 / 100 tests
Equipment
▲ 60.8% better
8.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 20.4 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 13.2% better
51.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 59.0 / 100 tests
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 543 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 82
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 81
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 66
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 61
A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 59
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 58
Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 33
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 32
A shock absorber damaged … or showing signs of severe leakage
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 27
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 20

Serious faults (Top 10)

Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
FAIL
Occurrences: 13
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 11
Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 9
A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
FAIL
Occurrences: 8
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 8
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 6
An SRS malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) indicates a system malfunction
FAIL
Occurrences: 6
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 6
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
Emissions levels exceed default limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 5