Skip to main content

Lotus ELAN - 1990

224.5 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 1990 is 257.0 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Lotus ELAN, model year 1990. Sample size: 266 cars, 572 tests and 1,284 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 266 cars

The 1990 Lotus Elan has an overall defect rate of 224 defects per 100 vehicles, which is 12.5% lower than the yearly average of 256 defects per 100 vehicles. Notably, the Elan excels in categories such as Steering, Visibility, Body/Structure, and Equipment, where its defect rates are significantly lower than the average. However, it struggles with Brakes, showing a higher defect rate than average at 131 defects per 100 vehicles. Mileage-related trends indicate that the defect rate increases with higher mileage, particularly in the higher mileage segments. Overall, the Lotus Elan demonstrates a mixed performance, with standout strengths in some areas and notable weaknesses in braking.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 266 cars

Categories

Brakes
▼ 29.2% worse
131.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 101.8 / 100 tests
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
  • Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
  • Brake hose ferrules: excessively corroded
  • Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
Steering
▲ 67.2% better
8.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 25.6 / 100 tests
  • Free play in the steering, measured at the rim of the steering wheel is: excessive
  • A steering ball joint: with excessive wear or free play
  • Power steering fluid leaking or system malfunctioning
  • Power steering fluid leaking or system malfunctioning
  • Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
Visibility
▲ 32.5% better
14.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 21.2 / 100 tests
  • Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
  • Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
  • Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
  • Wiper not operating or missing
Lights & Electrics
▲ 14.3% better
50.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 58.7 / 100 tests
  • A headlamp: missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED
  • Headlamp reflector or lens: slightly defective
  • The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
  • The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
  • A direction indicator: lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 1.0% better
175.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 177.0 / 100 tests
  • A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
  • A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A wheel bearing: with excessive play
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
Body/Structure
▲ 61.3% better
24.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 62.3 / 100 tests
  • A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot: severely deteriorated
  • A door will not open using the relevant control or close properly
  • Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
  • A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot: missing, split, insecure or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt
  • A transmission: joint, belt or chain excessively worn
Equipment
▲ 68.8% better
4.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 15.7 / 100 tests
  • is significantly reduced or The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a ’prescribed area’): inadequately repaired
  • Seat belt retractor not functioning as intended
  • Audible warning:
  • Seat belt not functioning as intended or of an incorrect type
  • Audible warning not in accordance with requirements
Other
▲ 22.2% better
40.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 51.7 / 100 tests
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
  • Any part of the noise suppression system: insecure
  • Emissions levels exceed default limits
  • Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer’s specified limits

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 483 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 114
A wheel bearing: with excessive play
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 69
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 68
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 66
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 53
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 50
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 49
Brake hose ferrules: excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 49
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 47
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 30

Serious faults (Top 10)

Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 30
Emissions levels exceed default limits
FAIL
Occurrences: 23
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
FAIL
Occurrences: 22
Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 20
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that: the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. Or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight lin
FAIL
Occurrences: 20
Service brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 19
A headlamp: missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED
FAIL
Occurrences: 18
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 16
Parking brake efficiency: less than 50% of the required value
FAIL
Occurrences: 13
A direction indicator: lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 11