Skip to main content

Lexus LC - 2019

38.1 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2019 is 108.6 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Lexus LC, model year 2019. Sample size: 107 cars, 270 tests and 103 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 107 cars

The 2019 Lexus LC has a significantly lower overall defect rate compared to the average car of the same year, with 38 defects per 100 vehicles versus 106 defects per 100 vehicles, marking a 64% improvement. Notably, the Lexus performs exceptionally well in categories like brakes and steering, with defect rates of just 0.74% and 0%, respectively, compared to much higher averages. Additionally, the model shows a strong performance in visibility and lights & electrics, although it has a relatively higher defect rate in wheels, suspensions, and axles compared to the average. Mileage trends indicate that defects increase as mileage rises, but the Lexus maintains a better score across all mileage brackets. Overall, the Lexus LC stands out as a reliable option with significantly fewer defects than its peers.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 107 cars

Categories

Brakes
▲ 98.9% better
0.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 62.4 / 100 tests
  • Excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution
Steering
▲ 100.0% better
0.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 2.8 / 100 tests
Visibility
▲ 35.5% better
8.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 13.8 / 100 tests
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
  • Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
  • Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
Lights & Electrics
▲ 60.4% better
5.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 14.9 / 100 tests
  • The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 46.2% better
60.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 112.9 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
Body/Structure
▲ 100.0% better
0.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 3.5 / 100 tests
Equipment
▲ 100.0% better
0.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 1.8 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 100.0% better
0.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 5.1 / 100 tests

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 289 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 65
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
PRS
Occurrences: 8
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 7
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 6
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
MINOR
Occurrences: 5
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
FAIL
Occurrences: 3
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 2
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
PRS
Occurrences: 1
Excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 1

Serious faults (Top 10)

Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 6
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
FAIL
Occurrences: 3
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 2