Skip to main content

Lexus CT - 2015

101.0 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2015 is 174.5 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Lexus CT, model year 2015. Sample size: 3,573 cars, 7,394 tests and 7,469 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 3,573 cars

The 2015 Lexus CT demonstrates a significantly lower overall defect rate compared to the average car of the same year, with 101 defects per 100 vehicles, which is 40.7% better than the average of 170 defects per 100. While tyre wear is a common issue across vehicles, this model stands out particularly in categories like brakes and steering, showing much fewer defects than average in these areas. It also performs better in visibility and lights & electrics, with considerably lower rates of defects than typical for its year. However, as mileage increases, the defect rates for this model tend to rise, particularly in the higher mileage categories.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 3,573 cars

Categories

Brakes
▲ 32.3% better
57.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 84.7 / 100 tests
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
Steering
▲ 88.9% better
1.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 9.9 / 100 tests
Visibility
▲ 24.8% better
12.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 16.1 / 100 tests
  • Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
Lights & Electrics
▲ 55.8% better
13.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 31.0 / 100 tests
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 36.4% better
113.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 178.3 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
Body/Structure
▲ 86.3% better
1.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 11.7 / 100 tests
Equipment
▲ 45.0% better
2.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 4.0 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 96.2% better
0.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 13.2 / 100 tests

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 342 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 1,511
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 1,051
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 795
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 583
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 473
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 313
Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 304
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 168
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: but not adversely affecting driver’s view
MINOR
Occurrences: 141
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 141

Serious faults (Top 10)

A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 168
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 141
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 110
A headlamp: missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED
FAIL
Occurrences: 103
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
FAIL
Occurrences: 85
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 66
Tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously not working
FAIL
Occurrences: 52
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 41
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 37
Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 28