Skip to main content

Lexus CT - 2013

145.3 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2013 is 221.9 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Lexus CT, model year 2013. Sample size: 3,826 cars, 8,033 tests and 11,671 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 3,826 cars

The 2013 Lexus CT has a significantly lower overall defect rate compared to the average car of the same year, with 145 defects per 100 vehicles compared to 219. This model shows a notable increase in defect rates with mileage, particularly in the higher mileage segments, but still performs better overall than the yearly average. It excels in several categories, including brakes and steering, where its defect rates are markedly lower than average. Additionally, the CT has a strong performance in the body/structure category, indicating fewer issues than typical for its age. Overall, this model stands out positively in multiple areas, demonstrating reliable performance compared to its peers.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 3,826 cars

Categories

Brakes
▲ 24.4% better
74.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 98.4 / 100 tests
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
Steering
▲ 55.8% better
5.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 12.9 / 100 tests
Visibility
▲ 20.6% better
14.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 18.0 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▲ 17.8% better
41.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 50.1 / 100 tests
  • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 34.9% better
142.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 219.6 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
  • A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
Body/Structure
▲ 67.0% better
6.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 20.0 / 100 tests
Equipment
▲ 38.5% better
3.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 5.2 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 88.8% better
2.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 19.6 / 100 tests

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 379 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 1,560
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 1,240
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 814
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 774
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 702
A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
MINOR
Occurrences: 452
Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 390
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 358
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 340
A shock absorber damaged … or showing signs of severe leakage
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 340

Serious faults (Top 10)

A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 251
A headlamp: missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED
FAIL
Occurrences: 181
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 139
A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has only one lamp or all lamps not working
FAIL
Occurrences: 124
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 124
A suspension joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
FAIL
Occurrences: 109
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 105
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
FAIL
Occurrences: 92
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 68
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 65