Lexus CT - 2011
166.6 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2011 is 274.4 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Lexus CT, model year 2011.
Sample size: 3,718 cars, 7,790 tests and 12,979 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Quick summary
Total: 3,718 cars
The 2011 Lexus CT has a significantly lower overall defect rate compared to the average car of the same year, with 167 defects per 100 vehicles as opposed to 271. Notably, the Lexus performs better in several key categories, such as brakes and steering, showing at least a 26% improvement in defect rates compared to the average. The model's defect rates increase with mileage, particularly in the higher mileage brackets, but it consistently remains below the overall average. Additionally, the Lexus stands out with very few issues related to body structure and equipment, highlighting its reliability in these areas.
Cars by mileage segment
Total: 3,718 cars
More model years for Lexus CT
Other models from Lexus
Categories
Brakes
▲ 24.8% better
82.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 109.9 / 100 tests
- Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
- Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
- Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
Steering
▲ 51.3% better
7.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 15.8 / 100 tests
Visibility
▲ 32.1% better
14.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 21.2 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▲ 39.2% better
41.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 68.9 / 100 tests
- A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 36.3% better
169.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 266.4 / 100 tests
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
- A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
- A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
- A suspension joint dust cover: severely deteriorated
Body/Structure
▲ 68.4% better
9.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 31.3 / 100 tests
Equipment
▲ 52.7% better
3.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 7.4 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 87.8% better
3.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 27.8 / 100 tests
Fault rate by mileage segment
Model
Year average
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.
Most common faults (Top 10)
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 1,633
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 1,206
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 906
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 888
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 759
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 708
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 447
A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
MINOR
Occurrences: 430
A suspension joint dust cover: severely deteriorated
MINOR
Occurrences: 421
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 363
Serious faults (Top 10)
A suspension joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
FAIL
Occurrences: 280
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 216
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 135
A headlamp: missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED
FAIL
Occurrences: 131
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 123
A tyre: with a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
FAIL
Occurrences: 100
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 94
A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has only one lamp or all lamps not working
FAIL
Occurrences: 94
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 90
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 87