Skip to main content

Jeep CHEROKEE - 2010

292.4 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2010 is 296.9 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Jeep CHEROKEE, model year 2010. Sample size: 137 cars, 317 tests and 927 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 137 cars

The 2010 JEEP CHEROKEE has an overall defect rate of 292 per 100 vehicles, which is slightly lower than the average for its year at 294 per 100. Notably, it excels in steering and wheels, suspensions, and axles, having significantly fewer defects compared to the average in those categories. However, it struggles more with brakes and equipment issues, showing a higher incidence of defects than typical models from the same year. Mileage trends indicate that the defect rate increases with mileage, particularly in the 62,000 to 93,000-mile range where it peaks. Overall, while the CHEROKEE shows some strengths, it also faces challenges in specific areas that may affect reliability.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 137 cars

Categories

Brakes
▼ 45.5% worse
167.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 114.9 / 100 tests
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
Steering
▲ 70.4% better
5.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 16.9 / 100 tests
Visibility
▼ 4.0% worse
23.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 22.4 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▼ 6.4% worse
82.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 77.6 / 100 tests
  • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
  • Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 26.1% better
210.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 285.3 / 100 tests
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
Body/Structure
▼ 9.4% worse
39.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 36.3 / 100 tests
Equipment
▼ 86.4% worse
15.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 8.1 / 100 tests
Other
▼ 26.9% worse
41.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 32.3 / 100 tests
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 470 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 66
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 63
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 60
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 53
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 53
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 49
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 37
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 31
A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
MINOR
Occurrences: 27
Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 25

Serious faults (Top 10)

Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 25
Stop lamp(s): all missing or inoperative
FAIL
Occurrences: 18
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 17
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 16
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 12
Parking brake efficiency: less than 50% of the required value
FAIL
Occurrences: 11
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
FAIL
Occurrences: 11
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
FAIL
Occurrences: 9
Parking brake inoperative on one side, or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight line
FAIL
Occurrences: 9
Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
FAIL
Occurrences: 7