JEEP CHEROKEE MOT Statistics by Year
Select a model year to see detailed MOT results; including pass rates, mileage trends, and the most common defects found for that specific JEEP CHEROKEE.
Defect rate by model year
The Jeep Cherokee has a storied history, having been a staple in the compact SUV segment since its introduction in 1974. Known for its rugged design and off-road capabilities, the Cherokee has garnered a loyal following over the decades. However, as with many vehicles, its reliability can vary significantly by model year, as reflected in recent MOT inspection data.
When examining the reliability of the Jeep Cherokee across various model years, the data reveals a mixed performance compared to the average car of the same year. For instance, from 1996 to 2004, the Cherokee exhibited a trend of higher defects per 100 vehicles compared to the average. The year 2004 stands out with a notable defect rate of 426, significantly higher than the average of 382. In contrast, more recent years, particularly from 2014 onwards, show a marked improvement. By 2016, the defect rate had decreased to 151, just slightly above the average, indicating a positive trend in reliability.
Recurring issues across multiple years include excessive fluid leaks and worn suspension components, which are common problems not unique to the Cherokee. However, the data also highlights specific concerns such as brake pipe corrosion and tyre tread depth violations that can affect safety and performance. Notably, the 2000 to 2003 model years consistently report defect rates above average, indicating potential quality control or design issues during that period.
Did you know?
Interestingly, the Jeep Cherokee has developed a reputation for being a capable off-roader, which may contribute to its appeal despite some reliability challenges. As it continues to evolve, improvements in later models suggest that Jeep is addressing past concerns, making the Cherokee a more viable option for those seeking adventure without compromising too much on dependability.