Skip to main content

Hyundai ILOAD - 2014

237.1 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2014 is 198.0 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Hyundai ILOAD, model year 2014. Sample size: 140 cars, 334 tests and 792 recorded faults.
0%
More faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 140 cars

The 2014 Hyundai iLoad has a higher overall defect rate than the average vehicle of the same year, with 237 defects per 100 vehicles compared to 194. Notably, it exhibits significant issues with brakes, steering, visibility, lights and electrics, and equipment, all of which are worse than the average for its cohort. In contrast, the iLoad performs better in categories like wheels, suspensions, and axles, showing a marked improvement over the average. Mileage trends indicate that defect rates tend to rise with higher mileage, particularly pronounced in the 0–31,000 miles segment, where the iLoad shows a stark increase. Overall, while the iLoad excels in certain areas, its higher defect rates in critical categories may warrant closer attention.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 140 cars

Categories

Brakes
▼ 75.5% worse
162.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 92.8 / 100 tests
  • Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
Steering
▼ 41.2% worse
16.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 11.9 / 100 tests
Visibility
▼ 52.9% worse
26.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 17.2 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▼ 163.8% worse
104.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 39.5 / 100 tests
  • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
  • Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 35.3% better
128.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 198.8 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
Body/Structure
▲ 11.5% better
13.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 15.6 / 100 tests
Equipment
▼ 126.7% worse
10.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 4.5 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 27.4% better
11.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 15.7 / 100 tests

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 450 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 66
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 53
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 51
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 44
A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
MINOR
Occurrences: 33
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 30
A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
FAIL
Occurrences: 24
Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 20
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 20
Brake disc or drum: significantly and obviously worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 18

Serious faults (Top 10)

A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
FAIL
Occurrences: 24
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
FAIL
Occurrences: 18
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 16
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 15
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 11
Beam image obviously incorrect
FAIL
Occurrences: 11
Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 10
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 10
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 10
A suspension joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
FAIL
Occurrences: 9