Skip to main content

Hyundai ILOAD - 2010

328.3 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2010 is 296.9 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Hyundai ILOAD, model year 2010. Sample size: 258 cars, 607 tests and 1,993 recorded faults.
0%
More faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 258 cars

The 2010 Hyundai iLoad has a higher overall defect rate than the average car of the same year, with 328 defects per 100 vehicles compared to the average of 294. Notably, it shows particularly high issues in the categories of brakes, steering, and lights, where its defect rates exceed the average by significant margins. In contrast, the iLoad performs much better than average in the wheels, suspensions, and axles category, indicating fewer problems relative to its peers. Mileage trends reveal that defect rates increase significantly with higher mileage, particularly in the highest mileage bracket, where the iLoad shows a notable spike in defects. Overall, while the model excels in some areas, it tends to struggle with safety-related components compared to its contemporaries.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 258 cars

Categories

Brakes
▼ 90.4% worse
218.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 114.9 / 100 tests
  • Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
  • Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
Steering
▼ 49.1% worse
25.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 16.9 / 100 tests
Visibility
▼ 17.9% worse
26.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 22.4 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▼ 48.6% worse
115.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 77.6 / 100 tests
  • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 32.1% better
193.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 285.3 / 100 tests
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
Body/Structure
▼ 2.5% worse
37.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 36.3 / 100 tests
  • A transmission shaft bearing: excessively worn
Equipment
▼ 59.3% worse
12.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 8.1 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 16.4% better
27.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 32.3 / 100 tests
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 483 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 167
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 152
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 139
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 92
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 76
A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
MINOR
Occurrences: 67
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 64
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 53
A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 46
A transmission shaft bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 45

Serious faults (Top 10)

Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 42
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 36
Parking brake inoperative on one side, or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight line
FAIL
Occurrences: 25
A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
FAIL
Occurrences: 25
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
FAIL
Occurrences: 20
Parking brake efficiency: less than 50% of the required value
FAIL
Occurrences: 17
Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 17
Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
FAIL
Occurrences: 17
A headlamp: missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED
FAIL
Occurrences: 16
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 15