FORD GRAND C-MAX MOT Statistics by Year
Select a model year to see detailed MOT results; including pass rates, mileage trends, and the most common defects found for that specific FORD GRAND C-MAX.
Defect rate by model year
The Ford Grand C-Max is a compact multi-purpose vehicle that has been designed to offer versatility and family-friendly features. Launched in 2010, it quickly gained popularity for its spacious interior, flexible seating arrangements, and practicality. However, as with any vehicle, reliability and performance over time are crucial factors for potential buyers, particularly as they consider used models.
In terms of reliability, the Grand C-Max has generally performed worse than the average car of the same model year. From 2010 to 2019, the vehicle consistently reported higher defects per 100 MOT tests compared to its peers. For instance, the 2010 model faced 360 defects per 100 tests, surpassing the average of 294 for that year by 22%. While the numbers have shown gradual improvement over the years, the 2018 model still reported 150 defects, which was 25% higher than the average of 120.
Recurring issues across various model years primarily relate to wear and tear components such as tyre tread depth, brake linings, and suspension parts. Notably, problems with excessively worn suspension components and insecure brake discs or drums were common across multiple years. However, these issues are not unique to the Grand C-Max and reflect broader patterns seen in many vehicles as they age.
The 2016 and 2017 models showed some of the best performance in terms of reliability, with defects per 100 tests dropping to 185 and 160, respectively. Conversely, the 2010 and 2011 models were among the worst, indicating that early models may require more attention and maintenance.
Did you know?
Overall, while the Ford Grand C-Max offers a range of features appealing to families, prospective buyers should be aware of its reliability track record and the potential for common wear-related issues. The model is often praised for its practicality, but its reputation could be overshadowed by the reliability concerns reflected in MOT data.