Skip to main content

Chrysler VOYAGER - 2008

421.5 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2008 is 340.8 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Chrysler VOYAGER, model year 2008. Sample size: 193 cars, 441 tests and 1,859 recorded faults.
0%
More faults compared to the average car of same model year

Quick summary

Total: 193 cars

The 2008 Chrysler Voyager has a significantly higher overall defect rate compared to the average car of the same year, with 422 defects per 100 vehicles, which is 25% more than the average of 337 defects. Notably, this model exhibits particularly high issues with brakes, lights and electrics, steering, and equipment, all showing higher percentages than the yearly average. Mileage trends indicate that as the vehicle ages, defect rates increase, especially in the highest mileage category over 124,000 miles. While tyre wear is a common concern across many vehicles, the Chrysler Voyager's specific performance issues set it apart from its peers.

Cars by mileage segment

Total: 193 cars

Categories

Brakes
▼ 74.5% worse
232.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 133.1 / 100 tests
  • Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
  • Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
  • Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
Steering
▼ 21.1% worse
21.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 18.0 / 100 tests
Visibility
▼ 5.9% worse
26.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 25.3 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▼ 35.8% worse
125.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 92.2 / 100 tests
  • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
Wheels & Suspension
▼ 6.0% worse
328.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 310.3 / 100 tests
  • A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
  • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
  • A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
  • A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
  • A shock absorber damaged … or showing signs of severe leakage
Body/Structure
▼ 15.0% worse
59.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 51.3 / 100 tests
Equipment
▼ 39.6% worse
14.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 10.1 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 15.3% better
34.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 41.2 / 100 tests
  • Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users

Fault rate by mileage segment

Model    Year average
0 568 0–31,000 mi 31,000–62,000 62,000–93,000 93,000–124,000 124,000+
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.

Most common faults (Top 10)

A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 193
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 111
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 100
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 91
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 84
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 78
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 64
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 53
A shock absorber damaged … or showing signs of severe leakage
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 45
A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
MINOR
Occurrences: 40

Serious faults (Top 10)

A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 29
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 29
Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 23
The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
FAIL
Occurrences: 21
Warning device shows system malfunction
FAIL
Occurrences: 17
A suspension joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
FAIL
Occurrences: 15
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 14
Stop lamp(s): all missing or inoperative
FAIL
Occurrences: 13
Parking brake inoperative on one side, or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight line
FAIL
Occurrences: 13
Parking brake efficiency: less than 50% of the required value
FAIL
Occurrences: 12