Chrysler GRAND VOYAGER - 2013
228.7 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2013 is 221.9 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Chrysler GRAND VOYAGER, model year 2013.
Sample size: 329 cars, 763 tests and 1,745 recorded faults.
0%
More faults compared to the average car of same model year
More faults compared to the average car of same model year
Quick summary
Total: 329 cars
The 2013 Chrysler Grand Voyager has an overall defect rate of 229 defects per 100 vehicles, which is 4.2% higher than the average for that year. Notably, the model shows significantly lower issues in steering, wheels, suspensions, and the body structure compared to the yearly average. However, it performs worse in categories such as brakes, visibility, lights, and other defects, indicating specific areas for concern. As mileage increases, defects also rise, particularly in the higher mileage brackets, reflecting a trend that aligns with general expectations for vehicle wear and tear.
Cars by mileage segment
Total: 329 cars
More model years for Chrysler GRAND VOYAGER
Other models from Chrysler
Categories
Brakes
▼ 59.9% worse
157.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 98.4 / 100 tests
- Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
- Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
- Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
- Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
Steering
▲ 72.9% better
3.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 12.9 / 100 tests
Visibility
▼ 28.3% worse
23.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 18.0 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▼ 23.6% worse
61.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 50.1 / 100 tests
- A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 22.0% better
171.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 219.6 / 100 tests
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- A shock absorber damaged … or showing signs of severe leakage
- A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
- A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
Body/Structure
▲ 87.0% better
2.6 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 20.0 / 100 tests
Equipment
▲ 9.6% better
4.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 5.2 / 100 tests
Other
▼ 68.4% worse
33.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 19.6 / 100 tests
- Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
Fault rate by mileage segment
Model
Year average
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.
Most common faults (Top 10)
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 210
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 124
A shock absorber damaged … or showing signs of severe leakage
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 106
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 82
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 78
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 75
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 70
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 70
A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: when rear registration plate has 2 or more lamps or light sources
MINOR
Occurrences: 62
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 57
Serious faults (Top 10)
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 57
Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 37
Brake lining or pad: worn below 1.5mm
FAIL
Occurrences: 31
Engine MIL inoperative or indicating a malfunction
FAIL
Occurrences: 29
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
FAIL
Occurrences: 26
Tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously not working
FAIL
Occurrences: 25
Parking brake inoperative on one side, or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight line
FAIL
Occurrences: 24
Parking brake efficiency: less than 50% of the required value
FAIL
Occurrences: 23
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 17
Engine MIL inoperative or indicating a malfunction
FAIL
Occurrences: 15