Chrysler CROSSFIRE - 2005
271.6 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2005 is 377.4 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Chrysler CROSSFIRE, model year 2005.
Sample size: 537 cars, 1,201 tests and 3,262 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Quick summary
Total: 537 cars
The 2005 Chrysler Crossfire has an overall defect rate of 272 defects per 100 vehicles, which is notably lower than the average of 376 defects per 100 vehicles for the same year, representing a 27.7% improvement. This model shows particularly strong performance in the categories of brakes and visibility, with defect rates significantly below the average. Additionally, it exhibits fewer issues related to wheels, suspensions, and body structure. Mileage-related trends indicate that defects tend to increase with higher mileage, but the Crossfire maintains a lower overall defect rate compared to its peers across all mileage segments.
Cars by mileage segment
Total: 537 cars
More model years for Chrysler CROSSFIRE
Other models from Chrysler
Categories
Brakes
▲ 22.5% better
122.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 158.5 / 100 tests
- Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
- Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
- Flexible brake hose: excessively damaged, deteriorated, chafed, twisted or stretched
Steering
▲ 14.3% better
19.2 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 22.4 / 100 tests
Visibility
▲ 40.8% better
16.8 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 28.4 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▲ 21.1% better
86.9 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 110.1 / 100 tests
- Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 32.3% better
212.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 314.1 / 100 tests
- A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
- A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- A wheel bearing: with excessive play
Body/Structure
▲ 51.2% better
30.0 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 61.5 / 100 tests
- Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
Equipment
▲ 55.8% better
5.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 12.9 / 100 tests
Other
▼ 5.1% worse
49.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 46.7 / 100 tests
- Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
Fault rate by mileage segment
Model
Year average
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.
Most common faults (Top 10)
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 258
A suspension component: excessively damaged or corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 223
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 208
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 202
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 192
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 175
A wheel bearing: with excessive play
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 152
Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 92
Flexible brake hose: excessively damaged, deteriorated, chafed, twisted or stretched
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 86
Exhaust system has a major leak or is insecure
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 80
Serious faults (Top 10)
A spring: or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
FAIL
Occurrences: 50
The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm … is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
FAIL
Occurrences: 47
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
FAIL
Occurrences: 29
Beam image obviously incorrect
FAIL
Occurrences: 25
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 23
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 21
Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that: the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced
FAIL
Occurrences: 20
A direction indicator: lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 18
Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 18
Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer
FAIL
Occurrences: 15