Bentley ARNAGE - 2000
169.7 faults per 100 tests
Year average for all cars of 2000 is 366.2 faults per 100 tests
Dataset: MOT tests in Great Britain (period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-09-10) for Bentley ARNAGE, model year 2000.
Sample size: 258 cars, 508 tests and 862 recorded faults.
0%
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Less faults compared to the average car of same model year
Quick summary
Total: 258 cars
The 2000 Bentley Arnage demonstrates a significantly lower overall defect rate compared to the average car of the same year, with 170 defects per 100 vehicles versus 362. Notably, it excels in various categories such as brakes, steering, and body structure, all showing markedly fewer defects than the average. While the Arnage shows a high defect rate in the lowest mileage bracket (over 400 defects per 100 vehicles), it performs better with increasing mileage, particularly in the 124,000+ miles category, where it has a defect rate of 675. Overall, this model stands out positively in critical areas, indicating a stronger reliability profile compared to its peers.
Cars by mileage segment
Total: 258 cars
More model years for Bentley ARNAGE
Other models from Bentley
Categories
Brakes
▲ 61.1% better
63.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 162.9 / 100 tests
- Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
- Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
Steering
▲ 75.0% better
6.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 26.8 / 100 tests
Visibility
▲ 39.3% better
17.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 28.5 / 100 tests
Lights & Electrics
▲ 45.8% better
43.3 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 79.9 / 100 tests
- Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
Wheels & Suspension
▲ 42.1% better
163.4 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 282.2 / 100 tests
- A suspension joint dust cover: severely deteriorated
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
- A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
- A shock absorber bush excessively worn
Body/Structure
▲ 93.8% better
4.7 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 76.1 / 100 tests
Equipment
▲ 57.6% better
7.5 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 17.7 / 100 tests
Other
▲ 42.9% better
33.1 faults / 100 tests
Year avg: 58.0 / 100 tests
- Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
Fault rate by mileage segment
Model
Year average
* Metric: faults per 100 tests.
Most common faults (Top 10)
A suspension joint dust cover: severely deteriorated
MINOR
Occurrences: 105
Fluid: leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 71
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 62
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 48
A tyre: with a lump, bulge or tear … or with cords exposed or damaged
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 45
Brake disc or drum: insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 41
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 38
A shock absorber bush excessively worn
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 36
A suspension joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
FAIL
Occurrences: 33
Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
ADVISORY
Occurrences: 33
Serious faults (Top 10)
A suspension joint dust cover: missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc.
FAIL
Occurrences: 33
Wiper blade: missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
FAIL
Occurrences: 13
A suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing: excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 9
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
FAIL
Occurrences: 8
An SRS malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) indicates a system malfunction
FAIL
Occurrences: 6
Parking brake efficiency: less than 50% of the required value
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
A shock absorber bush excessively worn
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
Parking brake efficiency: below minimum requirement
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
Lamp: missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than a half not functioning
FAIL
Occurrences: 5
Emissions test unable to be completed
FAIL
Occurrences: 4